CORRECTIONS to B030696.ASC                                                    
                                                                              
the paragraph from B030696.ASC:                                               
                                                                              
81 etc.                                                                       
   Whenever (EA > IA+2) .OR. (EA > IA+6), the ET is invalid.                  
   (Note that this is stated in the review paper,p7 with a little typo:       
   its EA-IA<2, not IA-EA<2, and 6<EA-IA, not 6<IA-EA.                        
   This is due to the fact that in laboratory calibrations the EA is          
   nominally IA + 4. The IA signal is regarded as more reliable in this       
   case than the target signal, since it is more exposed to noise. If IT      
   is also invalid, no speed determination results.                           
                                                                              
there is an error in the first inequality, this paragraph should read:        
                                                                              
81 etc.                                                                       
    Whenever (EA < IA+2) .OR. (EA > IA+6), the ET is invalid.                 
    (Note that this is stated in the review paper,p7 with a little typo:      
    its EA-IA<2, not IA-EA<2, and 6<EA-IA, not 6<IA-EA.                       
    This is due to the fact that in laboratory calibrations the EA is         
    nominally IA + 4. The IA signal is regarded as more reliable in this      
    case than the target signal, since it is more exposed to noise. If IT     
    is also invalid, no speed determination results.