Instrument Information |
|
IDENTIFIER | urn:nasa:pds:context:instrument:ds1.pepe::1.0 |
NAME |
PLASMA EXPERIMENT FOR PLANETARY EXPLORATION |
TYPE |
SPECTROMETER |
DESCRIPTION |
Instrument Overview: ==================== PEPE is designed to be a general- purpose plasma sensor capable of measuring electrons and mass-resolved ions over most of particle phase space from 8 eV to 33,500 eV. Because 3-axis stabilized spacecraft pose a problem for complete coverage of all possible plasma arrival directions, PEPE is also designed with a electrostatically scanned field-of-view (FOV) that covers a solid angle of 2.8 pi steradians once each 65 s. PEPE 'heritage' comes largely from work at the two collaborating institutions: SwRI's development of miniaturized electrostatic analyzer optics [YOUNGETAL1998] and LANL's development of linear electric field (LEF) time-of flight (TOF) mass spectrographs [MCCOMASETAL1998; NORDHOLTETAL1998;]. PEPE contains three sensors integrated within a single housing. PEPE contains a number of components such as electron multiplier detectors, carbon foils, and high ohmic surfaces that are sensitive to particulate and chemical contamination, The most sensitive instrument, the ion mass spectrometer, was protected with a cover that was deployed in flight. The two other sensors were flown without covers. Our calculations indicated that PEPE could survive the launch environment without a deployable cover, thereby saving cost, complexity and mass. Throughout ground handling, PEPE was fitted with sealed cover through which N2 purge gas was flushed. The cover was removed before the rocket fairing door was closed, but the purge continued through launch. PEPE in-flight performance indicates that the instrument did not suffer any deleterious effects caused by this approach. The PEPE optical system is rotationally symmetric about the central vertical axis and consists entirely of electrostatic elements. The optical system consists of three main functional elements: Angular deflection optics, energy/charge analyzers, and the LEF TOF optics. PEPE is located on a bracket at the upper (+Z) end of the +X-Y panel of the spacecraft such that the central plane of the PEPE FOV lies in the spacecraft XZ plane. This gives PEPE access to both the nominal solar wind direction and to the DS1 Miniaturized Camera/Spectrometer (MICAS) boresight direction located along the spacecraft +Z axis. PEPE FOV coordinates are illustrated in Figure 1. The 3-axes of the PEPE coordinate system are parallel to those of the spacecraft. Arrows in the figure indicate the sense of the numbering of angular pixels that make up the PEPE FOV. The angular coordinates for azimuth are defined between 0 and 359 degrees and correspond to the direction of arrival for both positively and negatively charged particles (e.g., +90 deg azimuth indicates particles arriving from the direction of the spacecraft -Z axis). The angular coordinates for elevation are defined as the direction of arrival of positively charged particles. Because of the nature of the deflection electric field that controls the PEPE elevation viewing direction, the direction of arrival of negatively charged particles is the opposite of that shown in Figure 1. The entire PEPE ion mass analysis system weighs less than 1 kg, uses less than one watt of power, is extremely compact and is designed to be integrated very tightly with the power supplies that drive it. Close integration with the power supplies is important to keep the mass and volume of PEPE down. Often, TOF mass spectrometers using high voltages require large standoff distances that translate into a large volume and thus a high mass device. The 15kV and ion MCP high voltage power supplies are designed to plug directly into the time-of-flight cylinder without the use of conventional high voltage connectors or cables. High Voltage Power Supply Subsystem. The PEPE electrostatic optics and MCP detectors nominally require 8 high voltage sources ranging in maximum absolute values from 3600 V for the MCPs to 15,000 V for the TOF. Four of these voltages (two for MCPs and positive and negative 15,000 V for the LEF TOF) are obtained from independently programmable high voltage power supplies (HVPS) that are adjustable over an 8-bit range but are otherwise static. Each deflection electrode requires a programmable bi-polar stepping supply (i.e., one that simultaneously creates equal negative and positive potentials) while the ion and electron ESA's are operated from two independent supplies. The most efficient way to generate the interrelated deflection and ESA voltages is to employ a so-called 'bulk' supply that biases the two bi-polar deflection supplies and the ESA supplies into a coarse operating range from which finer voltage steps can be set. The result is a power and component efficient system with 12-bit programmable high voltage control between 2500 V for the ESA's and ? 5000 V for the deflection electrodes. Because of the large number of HVPS in PEPE, efficient packaging of the supplies was critical. The method chosen eliminated HV cables and bulky connectors entirely. As mentioned above, the ion MCP and the two TOF supplies are each built into small easily installed metal-plated plastic boxes that insert into the central portion of the PEPE body. High voltage connectors are standard pin and socket connectors with insulating sleeves that interleave as the pins mate. The electron MCP supply is located on the same circuit board as the MCP and amplifiers. Because of the need for close proximity of supplies to the deflection and ESA electrodes, each ESA supply is located on a single circuit board that also carries the inner ESA toroid, inside of which is the ESA supply. The bi-polar deflection supplies are imbedded within the structure that supports the deflection electrodes. The interiors of all HVPS housings were parylene coated to passivate high voltage components and increase the dielectric strength of the housing insulation. Scientific Objectives: ====================== The primary scientific objective of the PEPE investigation is to study the interaction of the solar wind with small solar system bodies. On July 29, 1999 DS1 flew past Asteroid Braille (formerly 1992 KD) at a closest approach distance of 27 +/- 2 km (K. Fleming, personal communication). Unfortunately the encounter miss distance was well outside the planned value of ~7 km. The encounter geometry was also outside nominal values. Those circumstances, coupled with the apparent hard mineral makeup of Braille (e.g., pyroxene or similar), limited the charged particle signal that could be expected at DS1. Indeed, the PEPE data failed to show any evidence of solar wind interaction with the asteroid. Following the encounter with Braille, PEPE will have had the opportunity to sample the comas of two very different comets in 2001. Comet Wilson Harrington is thought to be a low activity highly outgassed body with little coma activity. Although a gas outburst was observed in 1949 [FERNANDEZETAL1997], it is presently unclear what the gas production rate will be during the planned encounter in early 2001. The second object, Comet Borrelly, is a relatively young object and was should be relatively active. The combination of observations near these two objects will allow PEPE to break new ground in the comparative study of the evolution of cometary comas and their composition. A second important PEPE scientific objective is the study of solar wind ion composition and ion and electron velocity distributions. DS1 and PEPE will provide a solar wind observation platform well away from the Earth during most of the mission. Data from PEPE during these periods can be applied to 3-dimensional studies of large scale structures in the solar wind, for example the evolution of coronal mass ejections from the sun. Simultaneous studies early in the DS1 mission will combine data from PEPE, Wind, ACE and Cassini plasma instruments to calibrate PEPE response. Solar wind data will also support demonstration of PEPE's operational capabilities in the plasma environment of the DS1 spacecraft. The quality, accuracy, and consistency of scientific observations of the solar wind made with PEPE will help establish the appropriateness and utility of new technologies incorporated into its design. Calibration: ============ Ions and electrons enter the PEPE optics through a grounded toroidal grid that defines the external acceptance aperture of the instrument. The grid also terminates the electric fields within PEPE. Immediately inside the grounded grid, ions and electrons entering PEPE experience an electric field that deflects them into the acceptance volume of the top-hat electrostatic analyzers. The deflection electric field is generated by two opposing, cylindrically symmetric toroidal electrodes. Equal voltages of opposite polarity are applied to the deflection electrodes so that, for example, ions coming from above the symmetry plane are deflected in the direction of the top-hat apertures, while electrons coming from below the plane are also deflected toward the top-hat apertures. The top-hat analyzers, one for ions and one for electrons, are positioned so that their apertures are located symmetrically above and below the central plane of the aperture. As ions and electrons enter the region of the top-hat analyzer electric fields they are deflected down or up into their respective electrostatic energy analyzers. Up to this point the optical systems are identical for ions and electrons. Elevation Deflection Analysis. The deflection optics consists of matching upper and lower toroidal deflectors whose shape is an exponential given by the equation: z = k1 +/- k2 exp[k3(r - k4)] (1) where z is the height of a point above the aperture mid-plane and r is the corresponding radius from the central axis. The value of k4 determines the radius of the inner edge of the deflection toroids and is 6.00 cm in PEPE. Although rectilinear deflector profiles can give nearly the same performance, an exponential shape was chosen because it offers the highest deflection sensitivity for a given plate voltage [ZHIGAREV1975). The particular configuration of the deflection plates themselves was also designed to create space underneath the electrodes for the placement of high voltage supplies. This improves engineering architecture at the expense of the deflection constant and hence magnitude of the applied voltage. The relationship between the angle of charged particle deflection (Gamma), the deflection voltage (VD) in volts placed on the electrodes, and the particle energy/charge (E/Q) in eV was obtained by ray-tracing and is given by: Gamma(deg) = k5 Q*VD/(E/Q) + 0.9deg. (2) Both VD and Q are to be taken as signed quantities. Thus, for electrons Q = -1 and if VD is positive then Gamma is a negative quantity in Figure 1. The nominal value of k5 = 134.5 deg per charge with a slight variation of < 10ver the elevation range of +/- 45deg. The constant of 0.9 deg represents an offset in the top-hat field of view. Voltages up to a maximum of +/- 5000 V can be applied to the electrodes which places a limiting value on the maximum angle through which particles of a given energy can be deflected: Gamma-max(deg) = 6.725 x 10**5/(E/Q). (3) This means that the maximum FOV deflection at the upper limit of the PEPE energy range (33,500 eV) is 20.0 deg per charge [Then how do we get +- 45o?]. The angular resolution of the instantaneous FOV is 4 deg FWHM for electrons and 3.6 deg FWHM for ions. These values are set by the separation of the deflection electrodes and the intervening collimation and are designed to match the acceptance aperture of the ESA optics. Different angular directions are accepted by stepping the deflection voltages through a program that causes the central FOV angle of regard to move from -45 to +45 deg (or vice versa depending on charge sign) in 16 linearly spaced steps. Equation (2) shows the relationship between particle energy/charge and the deflection angle. This implies that the voltage VD is dependent on the voltage VE that is applied to the energy/charge analyzer and determines the energy of particles accepted. Energy/charge and Angle. After passing through the angle deflection electrodes, ions and electrons enter an electric field created by two facing toroidal top-hat ESA's. Each ESA consists of concentric toroidal electrodes with a cutout in the outer electrode which functions as the ESA entrance aperture. Toroidal shapes are chosen because they result in a larger aperture area per unit of ESA electrode area [YOUNGETAL1989]. When a voltage is applied to the inner electrode (positive for the electron ESA, negative for the ion ESA), charged particles with the appropriate energy/charge and angle travel through the electric field to the exit of the ESA. Different energies are sampled by stepping the voltage on the ESA inner toroids. At the same time that the ESA voltage is stepped, so is the deflection voltage according to the relation given by (5). The open area formed by cutouts in the outer, grounded ESA toroids expose the oppositely charged inner toroids. This sets up an electric field that deflects ions and electrons into their respective energy analyzers. The toroidal apertures are set back 15 deg from the vertical. The ESAs are designed so that electrons travel through a bending angle of 90 deg, 75 deg of which are spent in the ESA. Ions travel through a total bending angle of 115 deg of which 100 deg are in the ESA. The combination of toroidal electrode separation and ESA bending angle sets the energy passband at (Delta)E/E = 0.085 (FWHM) for the electron ESA and 0.050 for the ion ESA. The relationship of voltage on the ESA to ion and electron E/Q is given by: E/Q = k6 * VE (4) Where k6 = 13.07 is an unsigned constant of the ESA geometry and is identical for the ion and electron analyzers. Substitution of Equation (4) into (2) gives the control equation for the combined deflection/energy analyzer system: Gamma(deg) = 10.27 VD/VE. (5) Electrons exiting the electron ESA are accelerated by +200 V onto a conversion dynode. Electric fields in the dynode/MCP volume focus the electrons in two directions so that beam image size is kept to a minimum and azimuthal angle of arrival information is preserved. The purpose of the dynode optics is to convert incoming primary electrons into secondary electrons of a few eV that can be easily focused on to 25 mm active diameter MCP. The toroid major radius at which the electrons exit the ESA is 41.66 mm, whereas the area onto which they are focused on the MCP is an annulus 6 to 12 mm in radius. The chief considerations in using the conversion dynode were reduction in the volume and complexity of a larger diameter MCP and holder, and reduction in overall detector background. The secondary electron yield of the nickel-plated Noryl(TM) plastic dynode material for penetrating energetic electrons is low relative to the efficiency of MCP's for these particles. The relative background improvement is calculated to be a factor of ~3 [YOUNGETAL1998]. The LEF TOF mass analyzer processes neutralized and charged ions differently. In the case of neutralized ions, time-of-flight analysis of neutralized ions is performed in the following manner: Ions exiting the carbon foil eject one or more secondary electrons. These are focused and accelerated into an annular outer ('start') section of the MCP located at the far end of the time-of-flight section. When the electrons are detected in the outer portion of the MCP, a signal is sent to the PEPE time-to-digital converter to start a 83 MHz clock. The LEF optics are designed so that the neutralized ion reaches the center portion of the micro-channel plate. When detected by the MCP, the time-to-digital converter clock is stopped, a vernier is applied to the time measurement, and the time of arrival as well as the information that the center ('stop') section of the MCP was struck is recorded. Because energy per charge of the ion, the length of the time-of-flight section, and the time-of-flight is now known, the mass per charge of the ion can in principle be deduced from the following equation: M/Q=2(E/Q \373 Eloss/Q + Vacc)(T/D)2 (6) Where M is the mass of the incoming ion with energy/charge E/Q exiting the ESA, Eloss is the amount of energy lost due to ion scattering in the foil, Vacc is the TOF acceleration voltage, D is the average length of the time-of-flight section and T is the time-of-flight. This is called 'straight through' or linear mass analysis because the electric fields inside the mass-analysis section do not affect particles neutralized in the foils. The mass resolution of this type of analysis is typically low, primarily because of variations in path length and particle energy introduced by the ESA, TOF geometry (finite foil and MCP stop region sizes), and scattering in the foil. Both the foil and the MCP have finite dimensions and the geometric paths of neutrals through the TOF analyzer are not constrained. Therefore a relatively large range of path lengths is possible. Which path is taken depends on the entry point of the ion on the foil and on the angle through which individual neutrals are scattered in the foil. Secondly, the energy of ions striking the foils varies within a range of may vary by up to 5%, set by ESA resolution. This energy range is significantly reduced by accelerating the ions through a 15 kV potential before they strike the foil. Furthermore, during traversal of the foils energy variations are introduced by scattering. Lastly, the finite resolution of the time-to-digital converter introduces relatively small errors. Thus the finite size of the LEF TOF optical elements (ESA exit aperture, foil and MCP) and the random scattering in angle and energy introduce a number of uncertainties into the TOF measurement. The resulting theoretical mass per charge resolution can be expressed by adding the RMS values of these quantities [BETTS1979]: (Delta)(M/Q)/(M/Q) = [SUM (Delta E) {E[(Delta)E/(E/Q - Eloss/Q + Vacc)]2 + [2(Delta)D/D]2 + [2(Delta)T/T]2}]1/2. (7) Where (Delta)E represents each uncertainty in energy introduced by resolution and energy scattering effects, the sum (Delta E) is over all such energy terms, E is the total particle energy entering the foil, (Delta)D/D represents path length variations, and (Delta)T/T is the electronic timing uncertainty. In the case where the ions emerge from the carbon foil with a charge state other than zero, they will be deflected by the electric field induced in the TOF section. This electric field is produced by a -15kV potential applied to the entrance to the TOF section and a matching +15kV potential applied to a spherical-shaped grid at the exit of the region. The potentials create a well-defined voltage drop of 30 kV along the sides of the TOF section induced by a resistive coating. The coating is applied to different sections of the time-of- flight region with different methods. Deposition of a constant thickness coating produced a constant drop in voltage. Deposition of a varying thickness that decreases proportionally to the distance from the foils squared produces a comparable variation in the voltage distribution and a linearly increasing electric field with distance from the foils. This carefully constructed electric field creates a restoring force on the ions in the direction of the axis asymmetry of symmetry. The force varies linearly along the axis of symmetry and is pointed towards the entrance (carbon foil) end of the TOF section. Ion trajectories are confined to the center of the TOF cylinder so that the linear electric field is not disturbed by any slight variations or irregularities in the coatings. Ions below an energy of approximately 18 keV will bounce in the field, executing simple harmonic motion as they do so. As a consequence, ion energy and flight path in the LEF portion of the TOF do not affect flight times with the result that mass resolution is increased over that of the straight through paths described above. The ions act as though they were a simple mass on a spring and thus the time of an oscillation in the linear electric field region is proportional only to the mass per charge of the particle. [MCCOMAS&NORDHOLT1990]. Ions with energies above ~18 keV will exit the LEF without undergoing a bouncing motion. Similarly, ions that leave the foil negatively charged will be accelerated by the LEF down on to the stop region of the MCP and analyzed with intermediate mass resolution. At the end of their oscillation nearly 1000f the ions strike a secondary emitter located at the center of the foil-end of the time-of-flight cylinder. Because of the properties of the cylindrical electric field, ions that do not pass close to the center of the LEF are deflected towards the cylinder walls and do not contribute to the signal. Electrons ejected by the secondary emitter are focused onto the stop region of the MCP and are processed in exactly the same manner as the straight-through events described above. Because the energy, angle, and variable path to length are no longer in the equation for mass per charge of particle, mass resolution improves to M/(Delta)M = 20. Since the same MCP is used for both the ST and LEF stops, the results is a single spectrum with two peaks per species (three peaks per species, in the case of species which may leave the carbon foil with a negative charge.) Detectors: ========== The electron detector consists of a stack of 3 individual MCP's arranged in Z- configuration. The MCP is operated with the entrance plate near ground potential and the exit at up to +3600 V. Large (~ 0.5 cm**3) high voltage capacitors are needed to couple MCP pulses to signal amplifiers whose inputs are near ground. The azimuthal FOV is divided into 16 sectors that require 16 anodes and corresponding signal chains and coupling capacitors. In order to save volume, the printed circuit board itself (made of Rogers Corp. TMM3 (TM)) was incorporated as the capacitor dielectric material sandwiched between the 16 anodes and the corresponding Amptec A111 amplifier inputs. The ion ESA bending angle of 100 deg was chosen to match the conical shape of the top of the LEF time-of-flight cylinder to which it is interfaced. Ions that exit the ESA are accelerated by voltages between -8 kV and -15 kV onto ultra-thin (nominally 0.5-1.0 microgram/cm**2) carbon foils located at the entrance to the LEF TOF analyzer. (Although PEPE can operate at acceleration voltages below -15kV, the latter is the nominal designed operating potential and will be used as the standard value throughout the paper.) A slit electrode biased at 500f the ESA inner toroid voltage is located 1.5 mm past the ESA exit. This electrode prevents fringing fields created by the -15 kV acceleration potential from penetrating back into the ESA and causing unwanted trajectory deflections. A uniform electric field inside the acceleration region leading up to the carbon foils is ensured by the use of a high resistance coating on the inside wall of the ceramic cylinder in the portion of the TOF section above the -15kV electrode (see discussion below). LEF TOF Analyzer. Ions enter the LEF TOF analyzer after being accelerated by up to 15kV. Acceleration by 15kV ensures that even the lowest energy ions will pass through the carbon foils with high probability and relatively small scattering angles. When (positive) ions pass through the carbon foils their charge state may be changed. Usually this means that the ion will attach an electron upon exiting the foil and will be neutralized as a result. A relatively small percentage of ions (usually a few percent to ~30 0epending on species and incident energy) will exit the foil positively charged. Furthermore, a varying percentage (from a few to ~30 0epending on energy and species) of incident ion species with finite electron affinities (primarily H, C, and O) will exit the foils in a negative charge state [BURGIETAL1990; FUNSTENETAL1993;]. Electronics: ============ LEF TOF Electronics. The MCP housing for the time-of-flight section is also a new design. A chevron configuration of two high-gain MCPs is used instead of a standard z- stack of three MCPs. The MCP holder is highly integrated and fits directly into the bottom of the time-of-flight stack. The capacitors and resistor needed to bias the MCP stack and decouple signals are built directly into the MCP holder. The anode is integrated behind the MCP holder and pins from it couple directly into the amplifier and discriminator electronics (termed the front-end electronics (FEE)) board. All time-of-flight information is processed on the FEE board via high-speed discriminators that encode the start channel that was hit as well as initiating the time-to- digital (TDC) clock. In PEPE, three constant fraction discriminators are coupled together to read out 8 individual anodes in a coded form. Each amplifier/discriminator is built as a chip-on-board (COB) module and 2 sets of 3 each are used to read out a total of 16 anodes. Eight of the anodes are devoted to coarse measurement sectors, 6 that cover 41 deg each and 2 that cover 20.5 deg each. Eight fine sector anodes cover 5.125 deg each. The symmetry of the PEPE entrance optics requires that all anodes have a boundary at least every 45 deg. Anode information is used to determine from which azimuthal sector of the sky the ion entered. The voltage settings for the elevation and energy analyzers are also reported so that all of the energy and angular information for a given particle is known before any time-of-flight measurement is made. All signals from the start anodes are recorded as ion 'singles' data. The angular mapping of the PEPE field of view as seen from PEPE's position on the spacecraft can be seen by combining the look angles with the coordinate definitions given in Figure 1. The central section of the stop MCP has its own high-speed discriminator which, when triggered, stops the TDC clock. Each amplifier/discriminator consumes only 35 mW with transition times < 1 ns. The amplifier/discriminators use balanced input differential voltages and have a 25,000 electron (25ke-) RMS equivalent noise with a 150ke- threshold level (equivalent to 75mV). A minimum signal of 300ke- is required from the MCP to achieve < 1 ns timing error. The TDC is similar to that used in the Cassini CAPS ion mass spectrometer (IMS). To save power, the base oscillator runs at only 83 MHz. The timing resolution of 750 ps is achieved by routing the start and stop signals into a vernier delay line which determines the ion time-of-flight to full resolution. Bin widths may vary as much as 100ps in a repeating pattern because of variations in the width of the taps in the delay line. The TDC range is 40 ns to 1536 ns with a pulse-pair resolution of 40 ns. The dead-time of the TOF read-out and sorting electronics is 1.74 microseconds. Singles data, on the other hand, are recorded with a dead time of 150 ns. The TDC includes its own built-in test (BIT) that allows all of the COBs to be tested by injecting a charge pulse at their inputs. A variable start-to-stop delay is also incorporated so that timing measurements can be checked. This makes it possible to test the entire signal chain from the anode to the DPU with the BIT. Correct operation can be verified at integration time or in flight. The TDC/FEE system also has its own ground support equipment (GSE) and simulator so that the TDC/FEE/TOF ion analysis section can be tested independently of the DPU and the DPU can be run with known inputs from a TDC simulator. Location: ========= The PEPE optical system is rotationally symmetric about the central vertical axis and consists entirely of electrostatic elements. The optical system consists of three main functional elements: Angular deflection optics, energy/charge analyzers, and the LEF TOF optics. PEPE is located on a bracket at the upper (+Z) end of the +X-Y panel of the spacecraft (Figure 3) such that the central plane of the PEPE FOV lies in the spacecraft XZ plane. This gives PEPE access to both the nominal solar wind direction and to the DS1 Miniaturized Camera/Spectrometer (MICAS) boresight direction located along the spacecraft +Z axis. PEPE FOV coordinates are illustrated in Figure 1. The 3-axes of the PEPE coordinate system are parallel to those of the spacecraft. Arrows in the figure indicate the sense of the numbering of angular pixels that make up the PEPE FOV. The angular coordinates for azimuth are defined between 0 and 359 degrees and correspond to the direction of arrival for both positively and negatively charged particles (e.g., +90 deg azimuth indicates particles arriving from the direction of the spacecraft -Z axis). The angular coordinates for elevation are defined as the direction of arrival of positively charged particles. Because of the nature of the deflection electric field that controls the PEPE elevation viewing direction, the direction of arrival of negatively charged particles is the opposite of that shown in Figure 1. Operational Modes: ================== Energy/angle scan programs are controlled by re-programmable voltage tables stored in on-board memory. The ESA voltage is held constant at one of 120 levels while the deflection voltage is stepped over a program of 16 linearly-spaced voltages that follow Equation 5. Each step is held for 32 ms so that a full elevation scan of +/- 45 deg is covered in 512 ms. Out of the 32.0 ms interval, 4.0 ms is set aside as settling time for the high voltage supplies. After a deflection voltage sweep is completed, the ESA voltage is advanced to the next step. ESA steps are spaced at logarithmic intervals such that the energy range is covered in 120 contiguous steps. Eight additional steps, during which the ESA is held at zero voltage, are used for detector background measurements. The complete elevation angle/energy range of PEPE is covered in 16 x 128 x 0.032 s = 65.536 s. In order to enhance PEPE performance during the flyby of Asteroid Braille, a fast-scanning mode was created that covered a smaller region of interest (ROI) in energy/angle space (16 deflection x 16 energy steps) using a shorter sampling interval of 8.0 ms. Measured Parameters: ==================== During each 32.0 ms sample interval, data from the 16 angle-sorted electron and ion counter/registers as well as valid ion TOF event and related logical event registers are accumulated in a double-buffered dual-ported memory in the data acquisition subsystem (DAQ). Data continue to be accumulated throughout one full angle/energy scan (65.5 s) at the end of which they are made available to the Harris RTX2010 microprocessor. The ion and electron data are stored in the MQ, TOF, and SINGLES memories that are operated in ping-pong fashion in order to allow the processor to move and operate on the previous cycle's data while new data are being acquired. An entire cycle of science data, including housekeeping and status information, is stored in processor resident memory to permit compression prior to formatting into CCSDS packets for transmission to the spacecraft data handling system. The PEPE data array contains a total of about 2.1 Mbytes of data acquired over 65.5 s. These data are transmitted to the ground at a maximum rate of 1024 bits/s thus requiring a compression ratio of roughly 32:1. Compression is achieved primarily by summing over adjacent elevation, azimuth and energy channels. In the solar wind survey mode, 4 adjacent elevation and azimuthal angular channels and over two adjacent energy channels are summed, thus reducing the angle/energy array from 16 x 16 x 120 elements to 4 x 4 x 60 elements. The TOF array is also summed over 4 adjacent channels. This compression scheme can be re-programmed in many ways in order to place the emphasis of the transmitted data on specific regions of interest within the data array. A second option for controlling the transmitted data products is to reprogram the angle/energy voltage scan table, creating a special region of interest (ROI) within the scan space of the instrument. Summing over these data then produces a higher resolution energy/angle scan that is averaged over the same 65.5 s time interval. This option was used for observations during the close-approach section of the asteroid flyby. Still a third option is to transmit the entire uncompressed data matrix over a period of 32 x 65.5 s = 35 minutes. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 1. PEPE Performance Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameter Range/Resolution Performance Units -------------------------------------------------------------------- Energy Range 8.0 to 33,500 eV/e Range scan 1280 steps, log-spaced (8 used for background measurement) Resolution (electrons) 0.085 (Delta)E/E Resolution (ions) 0.046 (Delta)E/E Analyzer constant 13.07 Mass Range 1 to 135 amu/e Resolution (straight thru) ~4 M/(Delta)M Resolution (LEF) ~20 M/(Delta)M Angle Range (EL) -45 deg to +45 deg Range scan (EL) 16 steps, linear EL deflection constant 6.7 x 10**5/(E/Q) (deg/V) Range (AZ) 360 deg Solid angle coverage 8.9 sr Resolution (electrons, EL x AZ) 256 pix @ 5 deg x 22 deg Resolution (ions, EL x AZ) 128 pix @ 5 deg x 5 deg Resolution (ions, EL x AZ) 32 pix @ 5 deg x 22 deg Resolution (ions, EL x AZ) 96 pix @ 5 deg x 45 deg Temporal AZ x TOF 0.008/0.032 s AZ x EL x TOF 0.128/0.512 s AZ x EL x EN x TOF 16.38/65.536 s Sensitivity* Electrons (deg x 22 deg pixel) 1.5 x 10**-4 cm**2 sr eV/eV Ions (5 deg x 22 deg pixel) 8 x 10**-5 cm**2 sr eV/eV Ions (5 deg x 22 deg pixel TOF @ +/-8kV) 3 x 10**-5 cm**2 sr eV/eV ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *Estimated based on ray-tracing. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 2. PEPE Resources ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameter Resource Units ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Mass 5.5 kg Power (average) 9.6 W Volume 7.25 liters Density 0.83 g/cm**3 Telemetry (commandable) 1024, 512, 250, 100, 50, 25 bits/s Operating range -20 to +35 C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- References: =========== Betts, R.R., Time of flight detectors for heavy ions, Nuclear Instruments and Methods; 1- 15 June 1979; vol.162, no.1-3, pt.II, p.531-8. Burgi, A., M. Oetliker, P. Bochsler, and J. Geiss, Charge exchange of low energy ions in thin carbon foils, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2547-2554, 1990. Fernandez, Y. R., L. A. McFadden, C. M. Lisse, E. F. Helin, and A. B. Chamberlin, Analysis of POSS images of comet-transition object 107P/1949 W1 (Wilson- Harrington), Icarus 128, 114-126, 1997. Funsten, H. O., D. J. McComas, and B. L. Barraclough, Ultrathin foils used for low- energy neutral atom imaging of the terrestrial magnetosphere, Optical Engr. 32, 3090-3095, 1993. Harten, R. and Clark, K., The design features of the GGS Wind and Polar spacecraft, Space Science Reviews 71, 23-40, 1995. McComas, D.J., J.E. Nordholt, S.J. Bame, B.L. Barraclough, and J.T. Gosling, Linear electric field mass analysis: A technique for three-dimensional high mass resolution space plasma composition measurements, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA, 87, 5925-5929, 1990. McComas, D.J. and J.E. Nordholt, A new approach to 3-D, high sensitivity, high mass resolution space plasma composition measurements, Rev. Sci. Inst., 61, 3095-3097, 1990. McComas, D.J., J.E. Nordholt, J.-J. Berthelier, J.-M. Illiano, and D.T. Young, The Cassini Ion Mass Spectrometer, in Measurement Techniques for Space Plasmas, AGU Monograph Series, 102, ed. by R. F. Pfaff, J. E. Borovsky, and D. T. Young, AGU, Washington, DC, 187-194, 1998. Nordholt, J.E., J.J. Berthelier, D.M. Burr, H.O. Funsten, R. Goldstein, J.M. Illiano, D.J. McComas, D.M. Potter, and D.T. Young, The Cassini Ion Mass Spectrometer: Performance metrics and techniques, in Measurement Techniques for Space Plasmas, AGU Monograph Series, 102, ed. by R. F. Pfaff, J. E. Borovsky, and D. T. Young, AGU, Washington, DC, 209-214, 1998. Wang, J., D. Brinza, R. Goldstein, J. Polk, M. Henry, D. T. Young, J. J. Hanley, J. E. Nordholt, D. Lawrence, and M. Shappirio, Deep Space One investigations of ion propulsion plasma interactions: Overview and initial results, AIAA Paper 99-2971, 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, June 1999. Young, D.T., S.J. Bame, M.F. Thomsen, R.H. Martin, J.L. Burch, J.A. Marshall, and R. Reinhard, 2?-radian field-of-view toroidal electrostatic analyzer, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 59, 743-751, 1988. Young, D. T., et al., Cassini Plasma Spectrometer investigation, Measurement Techniques for Space Plasmas, AGU Monograph Series, 102, ed. by R. F. Pfaff, J. E. Borovsky, and D. T. Young, AGU, Washington, DC, 237-242, 1998a. Young, D. T., et al., Miniaturized Optimized Smart Sensor (MOSS) for space plasma diagnostics, in Measurement Techniques for Space Plasmas, AGU Monograph Series, 102, ed. by R. F. Pfaff, J. E. Borovsky, and D. T. Young, AGU, Washington, DC, 313-318, 1998b. Young, D. T., J. E. Nordholt, and J.-J. Hanley, Plasma Experiment for Planetary Technology: Technology Validation Report, to be published as JPL Tech. Rept., 2000. Zhigarev, A., Electron Optics and Electro-beam Devices, Mir Publ., Moscow, 1975. |
MODEL IDENTIFIER | |
NAIF INSTRUMENT IDENTIFIER |
not applicable |
SERIAL NUMBER |
not applicable |
REFERENCES |
Betts, R.R., Time of flight detectors for heavy ions, Nuclear Instruments and
Methods; 1- 15 June 1979; vol.162, no.1-3, pt.II, p.531-8, 1979. Burgi, A., M. Oetliker, P. Bochsler, and J. Geiss, Charge exchange of low energy ions in thin carbon foils, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2547-2554, 1990. Fernandez, Y.R., L.A. McFadden, C.M. Lisse, E.F. Helin, and A.B. Chamberlin, Analysis of POSS images of comet-transition object 107P/1949 W1 (Wilson- Harrington), Icarus 128, 114-126, 1997. Funsten, H.O., D.J. McComas, and B.L. Barraclough, Ultrathin foils used for low-energy neutral atom imaging of the terrestrial magnetosphere, Optical Engr. 32, 3090-3095, 1993. Harten, R. and K. Clark, The design features of the GGS Wind and Polar spacecraft, Space Science Reviews 71, 23-40, 1995. McComas, D.J. and J.E. Nordholt, A new approach to 3-D, high sensitivity, high mass resolution space plasma composition measurements, Rev. Sci. Inst., 61, 3095-3097, 1990. McComas, D.J., J.E. Nordholt, S.J. Bame, B.L. Barraclough, and J.T. Gosling, Linear electric field mass analysis: A technique for three-dimensional high mass resolution space plasma composition measurements, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA, 87, 5925-5929, 1990. McComas, D.J., J.E. Nordholt, J.-J. Berthelier, J.-M. Illiano, and D.T. Young, The Cassini Ion Mass Spectrometer, in Measurement Techniques for Space Plasmas, AGU Monograph Series, 102, ed. by R. F. Pfaff, J. E. Borovsky, and D. T. Young, AGU, Washington, DC, 187-194, 1998. Nordholt, J.E., J.J. Berthelier, D.M. Burr, H.O. Funsten, R. Goldstein, J.M. Illiano, D.J. McComas, D.M. Potter, and D.T. Young, The Cassini Ion Mass Spectrometer: Performance metrics and techniques, in Measurement Techniques for Space Plasmas, AGU Monograph Series, 102, ed. by R.F. Pfaff, J.E. Borovsky, and D.T. Young, AGU, Washington, DC, 209-214, 1998. Wang, J., D. Brinza, R. Goldstein, J. Polk, M. Henry, D. T. Young, J. J. Hanley, J. E. Nordholt, D. Lawrence, and M. Shappirio, Deep Space One investigations of ion propulsion plasma interactions: Overview and initial results, AIAA Paper 99-2971, 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, June 1999. Young, D.T., S.J. Bame, M.F. Thomsen, R.H. Martin, J.L. Burch, J.A. Marshall, and R. Reinhard, 2 pi-radian field-of-view toroidal electrostatic analyzer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 743-751, 1988. Young, D.T., B.L. Barraclough, J.-J. Berthelier, M. Blanc, J.L. Burch, A.J. Coates, R. Goldstein, M. Grande, T.W. Hill, J.-M. Illiano, M.A. Johnson, R.E. Johnson, R.A. Baragiola, Kelha, D. Linder, D.J. McComas, B.T. Narheim, J.E. Nordholt, A. Preece, E.C. Sittler, K.R. Svenes, S. Szalai, K. Szego, P. Tanskanen, K. Viherkanto, Cassini Plasma Spectrometer investigation, in Measurement Techniques for Space Plasmas, AGU Monograph Series, 102, ed. by R.F. Pfaff, J.E. Borovsky, and D.T. Young, AGU, Washington, DC, 237-242, 1998. Young, D.T., B.L. Barraclough, J.J. Berthelier, M. Blanc, J.L. Burch, A.J. Coates, R. Goldstein, M. Grande, T.W. Hill, J.M. Illiano, M.A. Johnson, R.E. Johnson, R.A. Baragiola, V. Kelha, D. Linder, D.J. McComas, B.T. Narheim, J.E. Nordholt, A. Preece, E.C. Sittler, K.R. Svenes, S. Szalai, K. Szego, P. Tanskanen, Miniaturized Optimized Smart Sensor (MOSS) for space plasma diagnostics, in Measurement Techniques for Space Plasmas, AGU Monograph Series, 102, ed. by R.F. Pfaff, J.E. Borovsky, and D.T. Young, AGU, Washington, DC, 313-318, 1998. Young, D.T., J.E. Nordholt, J.L. Burch, D.J. McCommas, R.A. Abeyta, J. Alexander, J. Boldonado, P. Parker, R.K. Black, T.L. Booker, R.P. Bpwman, P.J. Casey, L. Cope, J.P. Cravens, H.O. Funsten, R. Goldstein, D.R. Guerrero, S.F. Hahn, J.J. Hanley, B.P. Henneke, E.F. Horton, D.J. Lawerence, K.P. McCabe, M. Shapiro, S.A. Storms, and C. Urdiales, Plasma Experiment for Planetary Exploration (PEPE), to be published in Space Science Reviews. Zhigarev, A., Electron Optics and Electro-beam Devices, Mir Publ., Moscow, 1975. |