Mission Information
|
MISSION_NAME |
INFRARED ASTRONOMICAL SATELLITE
|
MISSION_ALIAS |
IRAS
|
MISSION_START_DATE |
1983-01-26T12:00:00.000Z
|
MISSION_STOP_DATE |
1983-11-23T12:00:00.000Z
|
MISSION_DESCRIPTION |
Mission Overview
================
IRAS was launched on January 26, 1983 on a Delta rocket from
Vandenburg Air Force Base in California at 02h 17m Greenwich
Mean Time. The project was initiated in 1975 as a joint
program of the United States, the Netherlands, and the United
Kingdom. The satellite consisted of two main parts, the
spacecraft and the telescope system. The telescope system
comprised the upper part of the satellite and was composed of a
two mirror, Ritchey-Chretien telescope mounted within a
toroidal superfluid helium tank, which in turn was mounted
within the evacuated main shell. The optical system was
protected from contamination before launch and during the first
week of the mission by an aperture cover cooled with
supercritical helium. After the cover was ejected, the
sunshade limited heat flow to the aperture by blocking direct
solar radiation and reflecting away terrestrial infrared
radiation. The telescope was cooled by contact with the
superfluid helium tank to temperatures ranging from 2 to 5 K.
The surfaces of the sunshade which could be viewed by the
telescope aperture were cooled by a three-stage radiator to
about 95 K.
IRAS was succesfully placed into its planned 900 km altitude,
99 degree inclination Sun-synchronous polar orbit with an orbital
period of 103 minutes. With the telescope pointing radially outwards
from the Earth and perpendicular to the Sun vector, no Earth or
sunlight could enter the telescope and all ecliptic latitudes
would be swept out during one orbit while, as the line of nodes
precessed at a rate of about 1 degree per day to remain
perpendicular to the Sun vector, all ecliptic longitudes would
be covered in a period of 6 months. To allow mission
flexibility, the attitude control system and telescope were
designed to allow pointing away from the local vertical.
The satellite attitude was controlled by three orthogonal
reaction wheels; excess momentum was dumped via magnetic coils
to the Earth's magnetic field as necessary. The attitude, and
changes in attitude, were sensed by a combination of a horizon
sensor, a sun-sensor and three orthogonal gyros. The z-axis
gyro was used in all modes of control and was duplicated to
provide a redundant backup.
The telescope was constrained to point no further than 120
degrees away from the Sun, since at greater angles the fine Sun
sensor could no longer see the Sun well enough to function. It
was constrained also to angles no closer than 60 degrees
towards the Sun in order to avoid solar radiation falling into
the inside of the sunshade. A third pointing constraint arose
from prohibiting radiation from the Earth from falling upon the
inside of the sunshield or the top of the telescope baffle
system.
Infrared radiation from the Moon and the planet Jupiter was
sufficiently strong to affect the performance of the detectors
for a significant time after being scanned. An avoidance
radius of 1 degree from Jupiter was set within which the
telescope did not point. For the Moon, an avoidance radius of
25 degrees was used during the first two months of the survey,
but was lowered to 20 degrees after April 3 except between
August 26 and September 9 where it was lowered to 13 degrees.
At 25 degrees significant 'Moon glints' were entered into the
data stream. Diffraction spikes from Jupiter were also
introduced into the data stream.
Another constraint was a region of high proton density known as
the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA). Proton hits in the detectors
when passing through the SAA increased the noise to such an
extent that it was impossible to continue observations. Data
usually were not taken whenever the satellite entered a
geographically fixed flux/energy contour shown in the IRAS
Explanatory Supplement. This contour was mapped out during the
Presurvey portion of the mission. On May 9, 1983, this
avoidance contour was reduced slightly.
Every 10-14 hours, as the satellite passed over its ground
station at Chilton, England, observations would cease for
typically 10 minutes as data from the preceding 10-14 hour
observation period were being transmitted from the on-board
tape recorders to the ground and the commands for the next
10-14 hours of observations were being sent to the satellite.
For more information see Neugebauer et al. 1984 [NEUGEBAUERETAL1984].
Mission Phases
==============
PRESURVEY
---------
After launch, numerous checks were required to verify the
health and safety of the satellite and to determine the best
modes of operation. The cooled aperture cover was kept on
for the first six days to allow sufficient time for
contaminants carried up with the satellite to outgas and
disperse so that they would not freeze on the cold optics
when the cover was ejected. The eight days after cover
ejection were used to test those aspects of the instrument
that could not be tested with the cover on.
SPACECRAFT_ID : IRAS
TARGET_NAME : SKY
MISSION_PHASE_START_TIME : 1983-01-26
MISSION_PHASE_STOP_TIME : 1983-02-10
SPACECRAFT_OPERATIONS_TYPE : TEST
MINISURVEY
----------
The Presurvey period was followed by the repeated surveying of
a limited region of sky to verify the survey strategy and the
data processing facilities. The scans of the minisurvey were
hand-tailored for maximum efficiency coverage. The area of the
sky chosen, approximately 900 square degrees, consisted of two
strips of sky centered approximately on ecliptic longitudes 60
and 252 degrees. The region of the sky was that area available
immediately after cover ejection. No part of the sky above
galactic latitude 40 degrees was scanned. Part of the
minisurvey area was covered with four hours-confirming sets of
scans to provide a basis for testing the processing of the
survey. Minisurvey scans included observations during SOPs 29,
30, 33, 34, 37, 38, 41, and 43. More information on the
minisurvey may be found in the IRAS Explanatory Supplement
by Beichman et al. 1988 [BEICHMANETAL1988] and the IRAS
Minisurvey by Rowan-Robinson et al. 1984 [ROWAN-ROBINSETAL1984].
SPACECRAFT_ID : IRAS
TARGET_NAME : SKY
MISSION_PHASE_START_TIME : 1983-02-09
MISSION_PHASE_STOP_TIME : 1983-02-16
SPACECRAFT_OPERATIONS_TYPE : TEST
SURVEY
------
During this period, the strategy was to acquire four
coverages (two sets of hours-confirming coverages, HCON 1
and HCON 2) of the sky. This was achieved by defining an area
of sky ('lune') between two ecliptic meridians 30 degrees
apart which was 'painted' by survey scans, one after another,
as they passed through the viewing window of the telescope.
Using two gyros the spacecraft scan rate was adjusted so that
the sky was scanned at a rate of 3.85 arcminutes per second,
independent of the solar elongation angle. The first scan in
a lune was placed so that it crossed the ecliptic at the
lower longitude boundary of the lune. Successive scans were
laid down at increasing ecliptic longitudes, each one shifted
over by 14.23 arcminutes, that is by half the width of the
focal plane minus a safety margin. The overlap ensured that
measurements of the same area of sky were repeated within a
few orbits (for hours-confirmation) and by generally
restricting scans to be within 80 to 100 degrees solar
elongation, the curvature of scans would not be too severe.
The criterion for hours-confirmation was that the
hours-confirming scan had to be made within 34-38 hours of
each other. After a lune was filled, a second lune in the
same hemisphere was started. It overlapped half of the first
lune, ensuring that another hour's-confirming set of scans
was repeated after about one to two weeks, thus providing the
required repetition on the time scale of 7 to 11 days.
During this phase, 95 percent of the sky was covered.
See Beichman et al. 1988 [BEICHMANETAL1988].
SPACECRAFT_ID : IRAS
TARGET_NAME : SKY
MISSION_PHASE_START_TIME : 1983-02-10
MISSION_PHASE_STOP_TIME : 1983-08-26
SPACECRAFT_OPERATIONS_TYPE : STRIP SCAN
SURVEY
------
A third set of hours-confirming coverage of the sky (HCON 3)
was undertaken. Half circles rather than lunes were used
during this period, beginning with solar elongations near 60
and 120 degrees in general, and working towards solar
elongations nearer 90 degrees on succeeding scans. During
this mission phase, 72 percent of the sky was covered.
See Beichman et al. 1988 [BEICHMANETAL1988].
SPACECRAFT_ID : IRAS
TARGET_NAME : SKY
MISSION_PHASE_START_TIME : 1983-08-26
MISSION_PHASE_STOP_TIME : 1983-11-22
SPACECRAFT_OPERATIONS_TYPE : STRIP SCAN
POINTED OBSERVATIONS
--------------------
Roughly 40 percent of the IRAS mission time was devoted to
pointed observations of selected objects. Nearly 10,000 of
these observations were made of virtually every kind of
astronomical object. Raster scans were made of these objects
with scan lengths ranging between 1.6 and 6 degrees,
different numbers of scan legs, different sizes of cross-scan
steps between legs, and different scan rates.
See Young et al. 1985 [YOUNGETAL1985].
SPACECRAFT_ID : IRAS
TARGET_NAME : POINT SOURCES
MISSION_PHASE_START_TIME : 1983-02-10
MISSION_PHASE_STOP_TIME : 1983-11-22
SPACECRAFT_OPERATIONS_TYPE : RASTER SCAN
|
MISSION_OBJECTIVES_SUMMARY |
Mission Objectives Overview
===========================
The primary mission of IRAS was to conduct a sensitive and
unbiased survey of the sky in four wavelength bands centered at
12, 25, 60, and 100 microns.
|
REFERENCE_DESCRIPTION |
Beichman, C.A., G. Neugebauer, H.J. Habing, P.E. Clegg, and T.J. Chester,
1988, Infrared Astronomical Satellite Catalog and Atlases, Volume 1,
Explanatory Supplement, NASA RP-1190.
Neugebauer, G., H.J. Habing, R. van Duinen, H.H. Aumann, B. Baud, C.A.
Beichman, D.A. Beintema, N. Boggess, P.E. Clegg, T. de Jong, J.P. Emerson, T.N.
Gautier, F.C. Gillett, S. Harris, M.G. Hauser, J.R. Houck, R.E. Jennings, F.J.
Low, P.L. Marsden, G. Miley, F.M. Olnon, S.R. Pottasch, E. Raimond, M.
Rowan-Robinson, B.T. Soifer, R.G. Walker, P.R. Wesselius, and E. Young, The
Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) Mission, Astrophysica Journal 278,
L1-L6, 1984.
Rowan-Robinson, M., P.E. Clegg, C.A. Beichman, G. Neugebauer, B.T. Soifer,
H.H. Aumann, D.A. Beintema, N. Boggess, J.P. Emerson, T.N. Gautier, F.C.
Gillett, M.G. Hauser, J.R. Houck, F.J. Low, and R.G. Walker, 1984, The
IRAS minisurvey, AJ, 278, L7-L10.
YOUNG, E.T., G. NEUGEBAUER, E.L. Kopan, R.D. Benson, T.P. Conrow, W.L.
Rice, and D.T. Gregorich, A User's Guide to IRAS Pointed Observation
Products, IPAC Preprint No. PRE-008N, 1985.
|
|