Data Set Overview  :  We report radar observations (2380-MHz, 13-cm) by the Arecibo Observatory  and optical light curves observed from eight different observatories and  collected at the Ondrejov Observatory of the triple near-Earth asteroid  system (153591) 2001 SN263. The radar observations were obtained over the  course of ten nights spanning February 12-26, 2008 and the light curve  observations were made throughout January 12 - March 31, 2008. Both data  sets include observations during the object's close approach of 0.06558 AU on February 20th, 2008. The delay-Doppler images revealed the asteroid to  be comprised of three components, making it the first known triple  near-Earth asteroid. Only one other object, (136617) 1994 CC is a  confirmed triple near-Earth asteroid.   We present physical models of the three components of the asteroid system. We constrain the primary's pole direction to an ecliptic longitude and  latitude of (309,-80) degrees +/- 15 degrees. We find that the primary  rotates with a period 3.4256 +/- 0.0002 h and that the larger satellite  has a rotation period of 13.43 +/- 0.01 h, considerably shorter than its  orbital period of approximately 6 days. We find that the rotation period  of the smaller satellite is consistent with a tidally locked state and  therefore rotates with a period of 0.686 +/- 0.002 days (Fang et al.  [2011]. Astron. J. 141, 154-168). The primary, the larger satellite, and  the smaller satellite have equivalent diameters of 2.5 +/- 0.03 km, 0.77  +/- 0.12 km, and 0.43 +/- 0.14 km, and densities of 1.1 +/- 0.2 g/cm^3,  1.0 +/- 0.4 g/cm^3, and 2.3 +/- 1.3 g/cm^3, respectively.   The shape models are presented as faceted solids in Wavefront .obj format. Also given are rendered .png images of the shapes and tabulated rotation  states. In the rendered mages, colored regions indicate areas that were  not well-viewed by the radar observations (incidence and emission angle >  60 degrees). These facets are listed in the 'unseen' tables.

Confidence Level Overview  :  See Table 4 of Becker et al., 2015 for formal uncertainties. The shape  models of beta and gamma were computed as spherical harmonic  representations. The models here are faceted realizations of those shapes. The coordinate system is not precisely aligned to the center of mass and  moments of inertia. In principle, offsets could be physically meaningful,  but they are within the uncertainties for this model.